Thursday 13 December 2012

Making the Case for The Perks of Being a Wallflower

        
           So I know that I already made a post for Stevee Taylor's blogathon but the gracious Screen Actor's Guild awards and the AMAZING Amazing Spider-Man have already made it redundant. I am almost scared to write this post because clearly my favourites go nowhere, but once again, it has to be done.

       One of my most eagerly anticipated films of this year was The Perks of Being a Wallflower, and what a joy it is when the film meets all of your expectations head-on. I know Stevee wants singular aspects to be championed in this blogathon, but I have to focus on three things I absolutely loved in this movie, that I think are Golden Globe nomination-worthy at least.


Steven Chbosky wrote the famous coming-of-age book more than ten years ago and then he adapted and directed it himself. What more can one want? I love that the writer of the book wrote the film. He obviously knows the story more than even the most pious readers, and it was him who brought it to us. I read the book last month and I can safely say that the movie is better than it. I find it very hard to imagine epistolary novels into movies, and I am not particularly fond of them either. But The Perks of Being a Wallflower does away with that, while still keeping the essence of it.


Logan Lerman captures Charlie so beautifully in this movie. The outsider-ness, loneliness, friendliness, confusion, love that one would associate with Charlie is brought to life by him. He is both heartbreaking and incredibly relateable in this film. As my friend pointed out, it is a little hard to accept that someone who looks like Logan Lerman would be a loner, but he makes us believe that. One of the best roles that can be given to a young actor, and Lerman does full justice to it.


Now for this, I demand Oscar attention, like I did for Ezra Miller's equally brilliant performance in last year's We Need to Talk About Kevin. In that, he played the teenager none of us want to meet. In Perks, he might just be the teenage best friend of my dreams. As amazing as Miller is when he is being the outrageous and loud Patrick (that Dr. Frank-N-Furter routine!), he is just as incredible when he delves into the deeper and darker aspects of this glorious teen. I honestly think that he is one of the most exquisite young talents we have today, and Miller proves that yet again in Perks. I doubt I will see a better supporting performance this year.


        There you have it. Be infinite award voters! Give this truly excellent film what it deserves.

20 comments:

  1. I wanna be best friends with Patrick. Or Ezra Miller. Either way, I don't mind!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope this film gets what it deserves too. I love that you pointed out that Logan Lerman doesn't look like someone who should be a loner. In my review, I highlighted that as one of the genius things about the casting. The 3 of them (Miller, Lerman, Watson) are all attractive, stylish and popular....but they are still damaged on the inside. They could have easily gone with more average looking people, but I like that they didn't cop out like that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. Excellent point. I am glad that the principal cast was what it was.

      Delete
  3. Reading the novel and watching the movie at the age of 21,I couldnt help thinking my life would be much more easier and less stressful if i saw and read this during my teen days.Nice article!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well I read and saw it at 20. Couldn't agree more.
      Thank you and thanks for commenting :)

      Delete
  4. I'm definitely seeing this one during the weekend. I have a feeling Miller was close to the nomination today, but Supporting Actor category is extremely competitive this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really hope you like it. Goddamn Arkin man. I want Miller to get that nomination.

      Delete
  5. I really want to see this soon, but I don't know when it will come out here! I love the cast and the story seems nice! Oh, and about the awards, I see there have been some nominations for it, so you should be happy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope you see it and love it. The cast and story are awesome. Yes, but I want more!! :P

      Delete
  6. Great post ... you did a beautiful job of making your case. :-) I am really looking forward to this movie. Though I'm going to keep expecting Ezra Miller to come in with a bow and arrows and wreak havoc. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! Ahahahaa I understand the sentiments, but Patrick is wayyyy too awesome.

      Delete
  7. Yay! Glad you included Lerman on here. Though I liked Miller's performance (and even Watson's), I was blown away by Lerman. He surprised me after films like Hoot and The Three Musketeers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was really blown away by Lerman. So good!

      Delete
  8. I completely agree with your picks here - and Ezra Miller was my case for the blogathon too! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw! Thanks and thanks for commenting.

      Delete
  9. Such an incredible ensemble cast. Point well proven. This movie was one of the greatest surprises of the year, because I really had no expectations walking into it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I was hoping that it will be good, but never expected it to be *this* good.

      Delete
  10. Yay for this post! I agree with everything. Having read the book many times when I was younger, I have to agree that the film adaptation is better. It's success seems completely hinged on Stephen Chbosky's screenplay and direction. He really told the story the way he wanted and we get the rewards of it. I had my doubts about Lerman going in, but he really blew me away and captured the essence of the character Charlie without being quite the snively weirdo of the book (still weird, but not bizarrely so). Miller is what the most memorable aspect of the film though, and I look forward to all the great things he'll do.

    Honestly, this film reminds me of the Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close of last year - novel adaptation on a personal, sentimental subject - except that this one is fantastic, and that one not so much. How does that get a Best Picture nom when this probably won't see any of the more esteemed awards?

    I'm happy to see plenty of people who agree with our view though... just not Academy voters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yaay for this comment! :)
      It's so amazing what Chbosky did. Charlie was a bit annoying in the book, so glad the movie Charlie did away with all that.

      Oh god, if only this could get the awards attention. Award voters have such a small view of "youth" movies.

      I am glad too.

      Delete